Tuesday 31 December 2013

23 Topics for Loess Research

23 Topics for Loess Research [in 21st Century]

In 1900, at the International Conference of Mathematicians in Berlin, the famous mathematician David Hilbert offered a list of problems and topics to be considered in the 20th Century. This list became very famous and to some extent influenced the direction of mathematical research and scholarship; it set out directions and targets. Now, in a scaled-down, much more modest version of the target setting exercise we offer some target topics for loess research in the 21st Century. Hilbert offered 23 topics/problems and therefore we shall do the same: the 23 Topics for Loess Research:

1.  Words. Words have always been a problem; the word Loess requires lengthy explanations when introduced into conversations. Remarkably few people know what loess is- we need an educational programme. There may be a way forward in the use of loess as an adjective; loess ground has some virtues- we speak of loess deposits, loess soils, loess material..  Ground studies are beset by imprecision, we talk of clay when it is unclear whether we mean clay size or clay mineral. Requirement: more precision with words; a more perceptive use of words.



2.  Particles.  Loess is one of the classic particulate sediments. There are particulate generalizations that can be made; Loess is described as a silty sediment, and the mode mineralogy appears to be quartz. The mode particle might be considered as a 30um diameter quartz particle. The on-going problems relate to the factors constraining the particle size range, and the mode of formation of the particles.

3.  Structures. A defining factor for a loess deposit is the open structure, caused by the airfall mode of formation of the deposit. Loess deposit as particle packing; the packing structure of a loess deposit cannot be defined, although it can be modelled in various ways, which can give interesting and useful results. How to describe a packing; the one truly unanswerable question on the list.

4.  Bonds. Bonding between particles. The open structure is maintained by a set of interparticle bonds. In the loess system there is a complex interaction between short range and long range bonds. The basic system of primary mineral particles will be bonded by short range contact bonds but the interesting behaviour is mediated by long range, clay-mineral type bonds.

5.  Collapse. Initial collapse depends on clay mineral material which is concentrated at the major contact points in the metastable structure. The hydroconsolidation process becomes clearer and better understood, but further investigations are definitely needed.



6.  Mineralogy. Quartz is seen to dominate, but other minerals will become more important as they are used as indicators of provenance and age. Sophisticated mineralogy will continue to impress.

7.  Dust/Loess relationships. If loess is large dust with a mode size around 30um and small dust(travelling high in suspension dust) has a mode size of say around 3um.. are there other modes in this general size range or are there really basically two types of dust?  Confusion has arisen because of a failure to identify the nature of dust material in many studies.

8.  Places. Where is the loess? do we know?  How well is the world's loess mapped?  Is there widespread loess in Pakistan and N.W.India? How about Africa? the Kriger 1965 map showed no loess in Africa but there could be modest deposits. Loess is Siberia deserves to be better known. For various reasons various loess places have not been recognized and explored and investigated; some geographical action is required.



9.  pL Loessification.  Loessification has been sub-divided into small scale loessification (pL) and large scale loessification (gL). There is some interest in pL processes because they are seen as operating after Aeolian deposition. They serve to make the ground more loessic. The gL processes have been dismissed as too extreme, but pL processes, in particular the development of collapsibility, appear to merit further study.

10. PTDC systems. P provenence, the formation of loess material; T transportation, the moving of loess material; D deposition, the deposition of loess material, the formation of loess deposits; C change in the deposit. The C process has recently been added to the PTDC system- it may be here that attention is focussed, although the recognition of river action in the T stage is developing. In the C stage we find chernozemisation; C might stand for chernozemisation- it actually stands for change. The P and T processes fit securely in the world of sedimentology, the C processes are probably in the world of pedology. The D processes are transition processes. This transition has caused problems in earlier loess discussions.

11. Dating. Central to the study of loess. New techniques will be developed; greater reliability and precision will be achieved. The last 2 million+ years will be dated via the loess.

12. Climates  The alternation of loess and palaeosol gives a clear indication of climate change; precision can be improved. The Hardcastle observation(the loess/climate link) turns out to be one of the most fundamental and important in loess research.



13. Rivers. We see the Danube as a loess river, but what about the Niger, Indus, Dnepr, Ob. Rivers may have a key role to play in the T stage of the loess deposit formation process.



14. Other Planets. Mars maybe? Titan maybe? We need to be aware that the idea of loess on other planets may present interesting scientific challenges. The PTDC criteria will need to be applied; will they work on other planets?

15. Erosion.  Wind and water. Tensile failure; a disruption of the soil structure, a dispersion of the components, the breaking of the bonds which keep the structure intact. Loess ground may be the most erodible ground; counter erosion activities may need to be focussed on loess.

16. Deformation.  This could be mostly problems with slope stability, which still pose a large problem, particularly in China. Or it could deal with what has been called the 'Teton Dam' problem- the difficult properties displayed by remoulded loess. The great geotechnical problem related to loess arises from the collapse of the open structure and this has garnered most of the attention, but there are problems with remoulded loess.

17. Cyclicity.  Milankovitch gave cyclicity to the Quaternary. The cyclicity of the Quaternary is also manifested in the alternation of loess and palaeosol. There are views through other windows showing cyclicity; all shall be reconciled.

18. Larger Animals. Mammoths for example. Mammoth remains are found in loess deposits. It may be that mammoths had a special relationship to loess terrain; the Mammoth Steppe could have been a particularly loessic zone. More studies of the Mammoth/loess relationship are required. And studies of other large animals in the loess.



19. Smaller Animals. Cyanobacteria down at the very small level; here is a promising region of study and research. Snails- the classic small animals in loess; Lyell was impressed by the snails in the loess and modern malacologists maintain a high level of interest.

20. Agriculture. Ward Chesworth said that loess soils are the best soils. Loess brings good soil structure and good nutrient status; given enough water this is the ideal soil. The addition of loess material to a soil which is not obviously a loess soil gives added virtue. The soils of southern England are better soils for a sprinkling of loess. These loess-augmented soils need to be further investigated.

21. Civilization. The Chinese civilization, founded in the loess, is the oldest civilization. Loess promotes civilization. The early Europeans advanced up the Danube valley from loess deposit to loess deposit, and invented European art on the way (mostly at Willendorf).



22. Language. Varieties of English seem to have taken over the role of communication within the world of science. We need to be a little cautious in the world of loess, for good historical reasons. Loess study begins in 1824 and most of the early work was in German. Loess study is in many ways a regional study and we need to be aware of regional material written in regional languages. This is particularly true of Russian; there is a vast literature in Russian which will continue to have relevance for many years.

23. eWorld. Suddenly the whole world is the computer world. All science occurs within computer world, and loess scientists and scholars, like all scientists and scholars have to adapt. Is there are sort of loess/computer connection that needs to be recognised/exploited?  Has the incorporation of loess science into eWorld forced any changes or adjustments? This might be a really fundamental question, or it might be that the changes only occur at a second order level and affect the way we store our data and publish our results.

23 entries- and this is just a trial list. Please make suggestions for additions and alterations. Like the various loess historical lists which have appeared lately this list has a large subjective content. It is open to modification.
.

Thursday 5 December 2013

Charles Darwin comments on Loess

There is only one mention of loess in the 'Origin of Species':

"We have evidence in the loess of the Rhine of considerable changes of level in the land within a very recent geological period, and when the surface was peopled by existing land and fresh-water shells". (1859; Folio ed.p.305).

It is a very modest mention, but it merits some discussion. Some important geological concepts are embedded in this short quotation. We see Darwin indebted to Lyell for geological ideas. There are two Lyell concepts to the fore here- the importance of vertical movements of the land in geological processes, and the idea that loess is a lacustrine deposit. The lacustrine idea is used as an indicator, a verifier, for the vertical movement idea.

Monday 2 December 2013

FORE: First Order Rate Equations (& Loess)

Richard L. Handy  2013   FORE and the future of practically everything; a guess with a college education.  Moonshine Cove Publishing, 150 Willow Pt., Abbeville SC 29620  214p.

A new book by Richard Handy (who previously brought you 'The Day the House Fell' and 'Soil Engineering').  Now we have a look at First Order Rate Equations (acronym FORE).
log y = ax + b
"This book uses a special kind of telescope that looks back in order to look ahead. That is, it uses information from the past to try and get a handle on the future. This is not ordinary speculation and is not fully ordained and consecrated speculation; it is scientific speculation. It is speculation that is based on a simple rule called a 'first-order rate equation'. Hence the acronym, FORE. The acronym also has a nice forward look about it".

The basic assumption. The basic assumption is that a rate of change depends on the amount of departure from some final equilibrium state. This means that a process has to stop when some key ingredient is all used up. That is not complicated.
A rate of change can be expressed by dy/dt, where dy represents a tiny bit of change and dt is a tiny snatch of time. The / means to divide, as in miles/hour. The assumption therefore is:
dy/dt = ky
That is a definition...

On p.177 is a picture of loess- a classic cold-climate deposit. The FORE equation appears to work well on cooling climatic cycles(but maybe not so well on warming cycles). It also has some application in a geotechnical context related to loess because it can be applied to subsidence. Now subsidence is the no.1 geotechnical problem related to loess and many measurements have been made and equations activated. Handy focusses thoughts on subsidence on to Kansai airport, not a loess application- but relatable to the loessic situation. Handy operates with confidence in the geotechnical regions, and with respect to loess has a remarkable pedigree. Material by Handy appeared in Loess Letter 3 (check it out at www.loessletter.msu.edu). In fact Handy might be held responsible for the existence of Loess Letter. LL was inspired by a newsletter called 'Screenings from the Soil Research Lab' which was published from Iowa State University in Ames from 1957 to 1964. Copies must have been distributed world-wide because a set was kept at the New Zealand Soil Bureau, in the Soil Engineering Section at Upper Hutt. Roy Northey, who ran the Soil Eng.Section, luckily kept everything and copies of Screenings were there to inspire the initiation of Loess Letter(and the New Zealand Government Printer was on hand to produce the early copies). There is a paper on the application of FORE in a geotechnical setting which is highly recommended:

Handy, R.L. 2002.  First-order rate equations in geotechnical engineering. Amer. Soc. Civil. Engrs. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 128, 416-425

Handy, R.L.(writing as anon.)  1980. The loess problem, the great American tragedy, or the war between the states. Loess Letter 3, 3-10. (http.www.loessletter.msu.edu).

Saturday 30 November 2013

Loess near Tashkent

This is fig.10 (part of fig.10) from Scheidig 1934. This fantastic book is still a source of good things, and modified sketch maps will continue to be published. If one is allowed a little criticism it is that some of the maps are too small- so attempts at enlargement will be made.

Here we are to the west of High Asia but the classic deterministic model of loess deposit formation works well. Particle origins in the high mountains, substantial rivers for material transportation etc. The cities of Samarkand and Tashkent are emphasized on the sketch map- this is a classic loess region; many loess investigators were based in Tashkent in Soviet times and there is continuing academic interest in the region.

Most of the literature is in Russian; there is a fairly recent review:

Smalley, I.J., Mavlyanova, N.G., Rahkmatullaev, Kh.L., Shermatov, M.Sh., Machalett, B., O'Hara-Dhand, K., Jefferson, I.F.  2006.. The formation of loess deposits in the Tashkent region and parts of Central Asia; and problems with irrigation, hydrocollapse and soil erosion.  Quaternary International 152/153, 59-69.
[this paper should be accessible via the University of Birmingham website]. 

Wednesday 27 November 2013

Mammoths and Loess: Mammoths on the Mammoth Steppe; & in Serbia

Mammoth in the Loess- A Study Group:  secretary- Dr Nemanja Tomic, LAPER, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

N.Tomic,  S.B.Markovic,  M.Korac,  N.Mrdic,  T.A.Hose,  D.A.Vasiljevic,  M.Jovicic,  M.B.Gavrilov.  2015.  Exposing mammoths: from loess research discovery to public palaeontological park.  Quaternary International 372, 142-150.



Distribution of mammoths; compare to distribution of loess lands..

R.Dale Guthrie 2001  Origin and causes of the mammoth steppe: a story of cloud cover, woolly mammoth tooth pits, buckles and inside-out Beringia. Quaternary Science Reviews 20, 549-574.
"...during the last full glacial(LGM) say 18000 BP, most of the north was unimaginably arid..  rivers were reduced to streams...  loess sheets, sand seas, dune fields and wind were common features of this aridity; therefore Pleistocene skies must have been often dusty..."

D.A.Walker, J.G.Bockheim, F.S.Chapin III, W.Eugster, F.E.Nelson, C.L.Ping  2001  Calcium-rich tundra, wikldlife and the 'Mammoth Steppe'. Quaternary Science Reviews 20, 149-163.
"These so-called Mammoth Steppes probably had the following properties (1) more fertile soils that formed as a result of the continual input of loess..."

The mammoth steppe was the habitat of the Woolly Mammoth. The Mammoth flourished in this region; it was a remarkably successful animal. Large amounts of mammoth bones have been found in the loess of (e.g) Ukraine; the mammoths had an affinity for loess terrain. Was the entire expanse of the Mammoth Steppe in effect a huge loessial plain? This was how Keilhack showed it in 1920 and the more detailed map of Scheidig 1934 shows vast loessic expanses. Current discoveries of mammoth remains are often made in the 'yedoma' soils of Siberia. It has been suggested that yedoma is a loess variant.
The Frenzel map of 1960 of loess in Eurasia covers the entire mammoth steppe and displays a widespread distribution of loess. So, what was the relationship of the mammoth to the loess. Was the loess ground the place where the best fodder grew? How did they cope with the dusty Pleistocene skies?

The Dnepr as a Loess River

The Dnepr was one of the rivers considered by Smalley et al(2009) in their review of 'Rivers & Loess'. It is the main river of Ukraine. It is essentially flowing from north to south, so it is/was transporting material in a southerly direction. The implication is a northern origin for loess material.

The Dnepr debouches into the Black Sea, as does the Danube. In the context of world rivers relative to loess a simple classification might be into (1) rivers that start in high mountains and deliver, eventually, mountain loess [with possible desert interludes], (2) rivers that start in glaciated terrain and deliver glacially produced loess material. The Dnepr is in class 2, as are the Volga and the Don.

The Dnepr delivers a 'purer' form of glacial loess than the Mississippi/Missouri system which, in the case of the younger deposits, contains mountain material from the Rockies. The mountain system delivers loess in a much more continuous manner than the glacial system which is perforce extremely episodic.

The Dnepr may be the most significant river with respect to the delivery of glacial loess; it makes a nice contrast to the Danube. The idea of the Danube as a 'loess river' has gained currency. Particle sources have been recognized, transport paths identified and deposition zones demarcated- an edifying and satisfactory picture develops. Now, can we do something similar for the Dnepr? We possibly need the Dnepr as a default glacial loess river; the Danube can serve in a similar position as the mountain loess river.

Smalley, I.J., O'Hara-Dhand, K., Wint, J., Machalett, B., Jary, Z., Jefferson, I.F.  2009.  Rivers and loess: the significance of long-river transportation in the complex event sequence approach to loess deposit formation.  Quaternary International 198, 7-18.

Monday 18 November 2013

Loess in Ruritania: speculative geographies in a placeholder country

Ruritania is a fictional Central European country (Hope 1894, 1896, 1898).  Ruritania is also a placeholder country; this means that it can serve as a model country, an ideal country, a country or concept against which ideas or theories can be tested. A moderately recent study by Vesna Goldsworthy (1998) uses Ruritania as the model or focus for a study of literary visions of East/Central Europe. So Ruritania might be considered as an ideal geographical setting, and in particular as a visionary setting for a study, in general terms, of loess formation in Central Europe.



The placeholder idea might work well in the loess world, with loess science. We need, in loess science, a set of defining ideas. Until very recently there was considerable controversy about the mode of formation of loess deposits, and there is now some discussion about the ways in which the actual loess particles are formed. We see Ruritania as a setting for a deterministic vision of loess. In a deterministic system a set of rules will always produce the same, predictable result. So with loess we need some definite and credible ideas about making the constituent materials (essentially quartz silt formation), definition of the critical transportation modes in the early part of the deposition process- we need flood plains and aeolian transportation.

Ruritania has mountains and rivers; it is close to the Danube. It is the perfect setting for Central European loess. In the deterministic world Ruritanian mountains and rivers and the residues of glacierization must deliver loess. It is a principality; a young prince was born a short time ago, Prince George of Ruritania, and he will support the idea of Ruritania and encourage Ruritanian Studies. It is possible that some part of this deterministic landscape remains undiscovered and unexplored, there might still be tasks for field scientists crossing from Slovenia or Serbia or Moldova.

Not many landscape pictures available; the picture of Tintin entering the country shows mountains near the border. These could be the source of loess particles carried by Ruritanian rivers towards the Danube.

 

Saturday 16 November 2013

The Scheidig (1934) map of World-wide loess distribution

In 1934 Alfred Scheidig of the Saxon Mining Academy in Freiberg(Sa.) published his book 'Der Loess und seine geotechnischen Eigenschaften'. The book contained a map of worldwide loess deposit distribution (fig.5) which became and has remained the standard map of loess distribution. Now, nearly 2014, 80 years after the initial publication it is a good time for a close look at the map, and an assessment of its continuing value.
The first worldwide map is believed to be that of Keilhack (1920). This was a very simple map; it accompanied Keilhack's estimate that 9.3% of the surface of the continental crust is covered by loess. Scheidig (1934) offered considerable detail and divided loess into definite (nachgewiesen) deposits and possible/probable deposits ( wahrscheinlich oder moglich). The map was used by Woldstedt (1960) in his Quaternary treatise- it is the standard map of loess distribution. Woldstedt made a few small changes- his map comes 'mit geringfugigen Anderungen', as does our reproduction.
In 1965, for the Boulder INQUA Congress, N.I.Kriger prepared a worldwide loess distribution map. This does not compare well with the Scheidig map. Kriger chose an unfortunate base map projection; Scheidig (perhaps inadvertently) chose a good Mercator-like projection. Mercator tends to emphasize the mid-latitude zones, which is where the loess occurs. Woldstedt changed the base projection slightly- and did not improve on the original. Trofimov (2001) followed Scheidig (1934)- there has been no better version. Abelev & Abelev (1968) reproduced Scheidig (1934) as an exact reproduction.

Wednesday 13 November 2013

When George met Slobodan: an important encounter in the history of loess investigation

Meetings are important. In the 1830s Karl Caesar von Leonhard met Charles Lyell in Heidelberg, and the study of loess was truly launched. KCvL had defined loess, and given it status, by including it in his book 'Charakteristik der Felsarten'(1824). KCvL showed the loess to Lyell, who in turn, included it in his book 'Principles of Geology'. The Principles had world-wide distribution, was very influential, and served to spread the word on loess.

In 1997 George Kukla met Slobodan Markovic; a meeting also with consequences. Each brought something interesting to the encounter. Kukla was a significant pioneer in loess stratigraphy and had made the exciting connection between the loess record and the data from deep sea sediments. Slobodan, in effect, brought Serbia, and thus smoothed access to what are arguably the best loess deposits in Europe. Serbian loess stratigraphy became the benchmark for European studies and provided a useful impetus to the wholesale study of loess in the Danube basin. KCvL + Lyell promoted Rhine loess; George + Slobodan promoted Danube loess.

Smalley, I.J.  1978.  Pleistocene land-sea correlations. Nature 272, 754-755  [this is about Kukla's work on loess & deep sea sediments.]
Smalley, I.J., Markovic, S.B., O'Hara-Dhand, K.  2010.  Charles Lyell from 1832 to 1835: marriage, Principles. 2 trips to Heidelberg, snails and loess.  Central European Journal of Geosciences 2, 15-18.

Thursday 7 November 2013

Loess in Ukraine: thoughts & speculations (remembering P.A.Tutkovskii)

Recent investigations of loess in Ukraine have focussed mostly on stratigraphic studies of material in the west of the country (see e.g. Gerasimenko, Lanczont, Mroczek, Jary, Markovic etc.)
Also there have been some interesting geochemical investigations which have pointed out contrasts between loess in Ukraine, and in the Danube basin (see Buggle etc) and it seems likely that loess research activity in Ukraine will increase.

The loess in Ukraine can supply a test zone for the extended and improved PTD(1966) classification of events involved in the formation of loess deposits. It now becomes the PTDC(2013) system because it has become apparent that post-depositional events are as interesting as pre-depositional events. Provenance events (P) are particle making events- the formation of the material- the absolute origin of the loess deposit formation story. P events are sedimentological events, and so are T transport events. The material is transported by rivers, often for long distances, and subsequently transported again by aeolian action. D is the deposition event, when the loess deposit assumes most of its qualities, and where pedological processes begin.

As soon as the initial aeolian deposit is formed change begins: C events occur. C is important in Ukraine because C includes chernozemisation. The black soils formed in the loess help to define Ukraine- this is Black Earth country. The ground can become more loessic during C time. It can be claimed that loess formation proceeds during C time;'Loess is not just the accumulation of dust'. P: the Ukraine loess might be classic glacial loess; Tutkovskii made the glacial connection. Examination of the large geomorphology of the system indicates that northern glaciers provided the energy for particle formation. T: a large river is in place for initial large scale particle transportation. Again the geomorphology suggests a river:deposit connection. D: classic Aeolian deposition.

C: in particular chernozemisation in the loess matrix- and remarkably substantial A horizon formation. Collapsibility can increase in the C phase. Initial collapsibility depends on the formation of a meta-stable structure in the D phase. Movement of carbonates and clay minerals in the C phase enhances collapsibility( and contributes to small scale loessification).

Smalley, I.J.  1966.  The properties of glacial loess and the formation of loess deposits. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 36, 669-676.
Smalley, I.J.  1978.  P.A.Tutkovskiy and the glacial theory of loess formation. Journal of Glaciology 20, 405-408. 

Monday 4 November 2013

Loess Letter 69; an issue devoted to Loess Snails. On the cover Endre Krolopp the noted Hungarian malacologist ; inside studies on Braun, Soergel and Lozek. All issues of Loess Letter now available at www.loessletter.msu.edu. If you want a hard copy contact ijs4@le.ac.uk.

Saturday 2 November 2013

High Asia and related loess deposits
A sketch map from Alekseev and Dodonov 1989

Bee-eaters in QI

This is a Northern Carmine Bee-eater
 
Loess and Bee-eaters 1 has been published in QI; the paper concerns the European Bee-eater and its interaction with loess ground. Now Loess and Bee-eaters 2 has been submitted and is about the Northern Carmine Bee-eater and its choice of nesting sites in the African loess. Actually its more about ground than birds and attempts to place the 15N loess securely in its African setting.